This directory serializes the OAUTH-042 worked example from Institutional
Capability Lineage Architecture. Each file represents one governed object in
the execution trace and links to the identifiers produced by the preceding
step.
These artifacts target icla-spec: 0.1.0 and validate against the draft
schemas in schemas/. Both the instances and the
schemas remain non-normative at this stage.
Before INT-OAUTH-042, identity-policy change
CHG-IDENTITY-POLICY-008 revises the source’s authorized interpretation and
temporal applicability. The Registry snapshot preserves the complete,
inspectable path without introducing another principal artifact type:
CHG-IDENTITY-POLICY-008
-> BIND-IDENTITY-POLICY
-> IMP-IAM-008
-> CAP-IAM + its Registry relation neighborhood
-> DEC-IAM-008
-> DELTA-IAM-007-008
-> CKC-IAM v8 / APPEND-IAM-008 (inactive)
-> ACT-IAM-008
ASM-IAM-HIST-007 remains linked to CKC-IAM v7
The impact record identifies the affected binding, exact CKC versions, six
relation-connected capabilities, and every traversed Registry edge. Only
CAP-IAM changes canonical state; the other capabilities are identified for
impact review and remain unchanged. Activation applies to future resolutions,
which is why REG-SNAP-042 and ASM-OAUTH-042 subsequently select
CKC-IAM v8 while the retained historical assembly still points to v7.
REG-SNAP-042
│
▼
INT-OAUTH-042
│
▼
RES-OAUTH-042 / ADM-OAUTH-042
│
▼
ASM-OAUTH-042
├──> MAT-AGENT-042 ──┐
└──> MAT-REVIEW-042 ─┤
▼
EVD-OAUTH-042 / RCPT-OAUTH-042
│
▼
DEC-OAUTH-042 / APPEND-VERIFY-010 (inactive) / ACT-VERIFY-010
│
▼
CKC-VERIFY v10 (future resolutions)
REG-SNAP-042 records
capability identities, relations, owners, active CKC pointers, and the
pre-resolution CAP-IAM impact and activation history described above.INT-OAUTH-042 declares the OAuth 2.1 goal,
situated boundary CEE-OAUTH-042, configuration
CEE-CONFIG-OAUTH-042, consumer, risk, budget, constraints, and required
assurance.RES-OAUTH-042 navigates the Registry,
expands mandatory relations, excludes inapplicable capabilities, resolves
the compatibility conflict, retains matcher identity/version and explicitly
non-calibrated qualitative confidence semantics, and produces the
admitted outcome ADM-OAUTH-042 with a nonempty exact active-CKC map.ASM-OAUTH-042 snapshots six exact CKC
versions, selects and excludes knowledge, binds governed metrics, and
records the deterministic RequiredCovered method and validator version
plus the compatibility-conflict outcome and versioned policy basis before
establishing the bounded operational mandate. The assembly retains only its
own projection transformation and contains no later realization state.MAT-AGENT-042
records the CEE-controlled workspace realization and its distinct local
transformation.MAT-REVIEW-042
records the separate policy-dependent review representation. Both MATs pin
assembly and CEE, substrate/transformation versions, hash/access metadata,
evaluation/evidence bindings, and preservation of semantics and authority.
Executable lineage connects ASM-OAUTH-042 to both first-class records.EVD-OAUTH-042 returns
terminal, contract-selected knowledge produced by CEE-OAUTH-042 during
the autonomous EXE-OAUTH-042 interval as artifacts, provenance, five
conforming governed measurements, and one explicitly non-standard
measurement. Local reasoning and working state are not submitted. The
serialized object shows the
post-Gateway state; the executable test removes the receipt from the
submission and verifies that the Gateway recreates RCPT-OAUTH-042. It also
retains the identifier and version of the transformation used to construct
the submitted report, without treating such a transformation as mandatory
for every evidence bundle. It
records the execution as episodic memory, preserves candidate producer and
execution identity, and declares submitted candidate lifecycle and
memory-role transitions.DEC-OAUTH-042
accepts the conforming evidence, retains a local exception, authorizes the
complete successor CKC-VERIFY v10, records its inactive append as
APPEND-VERIFY-010, and activates that exact appended version through
ACT-VERIFY-010 only for future resolutions. The decision links its impact assessment to an
identified change event, records CKC-VERIFY v9 as the exact rollback
target. It links complete successor CKC-VERIFY v10 to
DELTA-VERIFY-009-010, which records the changed CKC commitments,
rationale, supporting evidence, authorizing decision, and rollback without
acting as a reconstruction patch. It references, but does not embed or
promote, PROP-AUTH-EVOL-01.CKC-VERIFY v10 contract records its predecessor, scope, obligations,
authorities, evidence and evaluation definitions, source bindings,
projection rules, governing decision, and decision-linked successor delta.The trace treats semantic, procedural, and episodic as overlapping functional
roles. DEC-OAUTH-042 retains the service-local exception as an episodic
precedent and admits the reusable compatibility-test pattern as a procedural
commitment in CKC-VERIFY v10.
IMP-IAM-008 and
DEC-IAM-008 to ACT-IAM-008.ASM-IAM-HIST-007 remains linked to CKC-IAM v7; the OAuth resolution uses
the subsequently activated CKC-IAM v8.ASM-OAUTH-042 remains immutably linked to CKC-VERIFY v9.APPEND-VERIFY-010 adds CKC-VERIFY v10 to the lineage without changing
the active pointer.[v9, v10] canonical lineage.CKC-VERIFY v10 after activation.CKC-VERIFY v9 remains eligible for later reactivation only through a new
approved pointer decision; the original successor activation is not reused.PROP-AUTH-EVOL-01 remains a pre-institutional candidate; its proposed
relations refer directionally to existing capabilities without assigning the
future identity. Later recurrent executions may provide the evidence required
under this history-driven review path. This is not a universal formation
precondition: other proposals may be
supported by unresolved intents, strategic decisions, process-analysis or
onboarding records and a justified prospective continuity expectation. The OAuth
trace does not assign
CAP-AUTH-EVOL, create CKC-AUTH-EVOL v1, or validate promotion-origin
links.The trace executes successor evolution within an existing capability and
represents the separately governed crystallization boundary without promoting
its candidate. The independent
auth-evolution-formation trace exercises
the later submitted-proposal formation path without changing the scientific
meaning of this single-execution example.